Bruner Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

The poverty rate is 28%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. SNAP participation runs 26.0% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tulsa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the OK average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 39% of renters.

Average gross rent is $1,037, close to the Tulsa average.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.