Woodrow Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa
Tract 40143000500 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,310 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 40143000500 covers part of the Woodrow Park area of Tulsa, OK, and scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Tulsa and the region
Centroid at 36.1860, -95.9688 · click any tract to drill in
Why Woodrow Park scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Woodrow Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 24%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 35.2%Housing insecurity
- 30.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 48.1%Food insecurity
- 51.4%SNAP enrollment
- 24.1%Transit barriers
- 17.3%No health insurance
- 23.6%Frequent mental distress
- 52.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Woodrow Park
What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 51.4% against 15.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 44%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 55% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 30.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Average gross rent is $723, 31% below the Tulsa average. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.1/10.
Set annual rent against average income of $25,972 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. 65% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 58th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.5/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 40143000500
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143000500?
What is the average rent in tract 40143000500?
What is the poverty rate in tract 40143000500?
How socially vulnerable is tract 40143000500?
Is tract 40143000500 considered part of Woodrow Park?
What share of households in tract 40143000500 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 40143000500 compare to Tulsa overall?
Was tract 40143000500 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa
Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.