Neighborhood · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally

Crutchfield Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143001200 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 1,422 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

40143001200 is a census tract in the Crutchfield area of Tulsa, OK. It scores 3.9/10 for landlords. 27% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Tulsa County average of 40.3%.

Risk score

3.9

Lower

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 39% Owners 47%

Tract context

Occupied units588

Renter share52.9%

SVI overall0.87

Poverty rate15.6%

Median income$58,047

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1686, -95.9752 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crutchfield scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Tulsa

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.2

State political climate

Oklahoma legislature & governorship

1.5

Economic stress

15.6% poverty · this tract

3.9

Supply constraint

$865 rent vs county FMR

2.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Tulsa

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Tulsa

3.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Tulsa

2.5

How Crutchfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

82%Socioeconomic
98%Household composition
77%Racial/ethnic minority
51%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
99%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

27.9%Housing insecurity
18.0%Utility-shutoff threat
35.8%Food insecurity
27.9%SNAP enrollment
16.5%Transit barriers
27.8%No health insurance
20.9%Frequent mental distress
46.4%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crutchfield

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 46.4% against 31.5% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 27.9% against 14.2% nationally. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.

The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. At $865 a month, rents run 18% under what the rest of Tulsa commands.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 40th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $58,047, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143001200

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143001200?

Census tract 40143001200 in the Crutchfield neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 40143001200?

Median gross rent is $865/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143001200?

15.6% of residents in tract 40143001200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,422.

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143001200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 98th, minority 77th, housing 51th.

Is tract 40143001200 considered part of Crutchfield?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143001200 fall within Crutchfield (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 40143001200 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 40143001200 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143001200 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 40143001200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.