Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Cook Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tigard

Tract 41067032001 · Washington County, OR · pop 6,165 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

For landlords sizing up Cook Park in Tigard, census tract 41067032001 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.5/10. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,859 monthly, set against $106,261 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 23% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,148
Renter share45.0%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate18.9%
Median income$106,261

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Cook Park
Very High
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Tigard
Elevated
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#25 of 134 tracts In Washington County
High
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#608 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tigard and the region

Centroid at 45.3892, -122.7949 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cook Park scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
18.9% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,859 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
5.9

How Cook Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cook Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 032001Tigard: 6.96.9Tigardparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 373Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 6.77%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.5%Peak (2012)
  • 30Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410670320012012: 82 filings (8.53/100 renter HHs)2013: 72 filings (7.49/100 renter HHs)2014: 73 filings (7.60/100 renter HHs)2015: 54 filings (5.62/100 renter HHs)2016: 62 filings (7.65/100 renter HHs)2018: 30 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 63% over the past 6 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 209Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.19×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cook Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cook Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tigard eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Washington County average of 5.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.19x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41067032001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067032001?

Census tract 41067032001 in the Cook Park neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41067032001?

Median gross rent is $1,859/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41067032001?

18.9% of residents in tract 41067032001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,165.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41067032001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 40th, minority 51th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 41067032001 considered part of Cook Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067032001 fall within Cook Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067032001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 373 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067032001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.77% of renter households, peaking at 8.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41067032001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.19× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41067032001 compare to Tigard overall?

Tract 41067032001 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Tigard at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tigard

Top eight tracts in Tigard ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related