Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Cook Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Tigard

Tract 41067030805 · Washington County, OR · pop 3,828 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 41067030805 in the Cook Park area of Tigard ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,828 residents. That is riskier than about 71% of US census tracts.

About 44% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,485 a month against an average household income of $90,898 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 24% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,801
Renter share42.5%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$90,898

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Cook Park
Very Low
Within parent city
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 12 tracts In Tigard
Elevated
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#63 of 134 tracts In Washington County
Moderate
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#801 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tigard and the region

Centroid at 45.4000, -122.7802 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cook Park scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,485 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
5.6

How Cook Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cook Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 030805Tigard: 6.96.9Tigardparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 143Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 3.30%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.7%Peak (2016)
  • 29Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410670308052012: 17 filings (2.40/100 renter HHs)2013: 25 filings (3.53/100 renter HHs)2014: 14 filings (1.97/100 renter HHs)2015: 16 filings (2.26/100 renter HHs)2016: 42 filings (5.71/100 renter HHs)2018: 29 filings (3.95/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 71% over the past 6 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 406Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.41×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-11-01: 11 filings (2.20× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 13 filings (2.60× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 14 filings (3.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 13 filings (2.60× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 15 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 12 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (2.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-12-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 21 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 18 filings (9.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 14 filings (2.80× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cook Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cook Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tigard eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Washington County average of 5.9 and in line with the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.41x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 143 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 3.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.7% of renter households in 2016.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 41067030805

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067030805?

Census tract 41067030805 in the Cook Park neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41067030805?

Median gross rent is $1,485/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41067030805?

7.6% of residents in tract 41067030805 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,828.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41067030805?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 63th, minority 48th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 41067030805 considered part of Cook Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067030805 fall within Cook Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067030805?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 143 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067030805 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.30% of renter households, peaking at 5.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41067030805 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.41× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41067030805 compare to Tigard overall?

Tract 41067030805 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Tigard at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tigard

Top eight tracts in Tigard ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related