Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

North End Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kingston

Tract 42079212800 · Luzerne County, PA · pop 3,538 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 42079212800 covers part of the North End area of Kingston, PA, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,538 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 24% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,479
Renter share39.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate13.7%
Median income$78,371

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In North End
Very Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Kingston
Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 101 tracts In Luzerne County
Moderate
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#1,763 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kingston and the region

Centroid at 41.2683, -75.8830 · click any tract to drill in

Why North End scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
13.7% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,055 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kingston
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kingston
6.3

How North End compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North End risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 2128004.5Kingstonparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 98Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.7%Peak (2006)
  • 38Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42079212800
Filings climbed 280% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North End. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North End

26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.1/10.

Court records carry 98 eviction filings across 7 observed years. The worst year on record was 2006, when 7.7% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Wilkes-Barre. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 2.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $78,371, annual rent is just 16%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 38% of renters.

It tracks the Luzerne County average of 4.5 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 42079212800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42079212800?

Census tract 42079212800 in the North End neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42079212800?

Median gross rent is $1,055/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42079212800?

13.7% of residents in tract 42079212800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,538.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42079212800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 42th, minority 2th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 42079212800 considered part of North End?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42079212800 fall within North End (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42079212800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 98 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42079212800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.65% of renter households, peaking at 7.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42079212800 compare to Kingston overall?

Tract 42079212800 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Kingston at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kingston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42079212800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kingston

Top eight tracts in Kingston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related