Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Kingston Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 42079212700 · Luzerne County, PA · pop 4,850

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 42079212700 in Kingston, PA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 37% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,338
Renter share58.4%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate27.2%
Median income$40,561

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Kingston
Very High
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#20 of 101 tracts In Luzerne County
High
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#683 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
High
National
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#19,618 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kingston and the region

Centroid at 41.2700, -75.8948 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kingston scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
27.2% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$942 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kingston
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kingston
6.3

How Kingston compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kingston risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 2127004.5Kingstonparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 260Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.9%Peak (2006)
  • 62Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42079212700
Filings climbed 68% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kingston

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

It sits 1.4 points above the Luzerne County average of 4.5. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.1/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 260 filings here across 7 tracked years. At $942 a month, rents run 9% under what the rest of Kingston commands. Filings peaked in 2006 at 4.9% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 42079212700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42079212700?

Census tract 42079212700 in Kingston scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42079212700?

Median gross rent is $942/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42079212700?

27.2% of residents in tract 42079212700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,850.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42079212700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 58th, minority 19th, housing 73th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42079212700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 260 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42079212700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.96% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42079212700 compare to Kingston overall?

Tract 42079212700 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Kingston at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kingston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 42079212700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kingston

Top eight tracts in Kingston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related