Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

North End Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kingston

Tract 42079212900 · Luzerne County, PA · pop 1,561 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

With a score of 5.1/10, tract 42079212900 in the North End area of Kingston, PA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,561. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 26% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units570
Renter share41.8%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate22.2%
Median income$66,417

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In North End
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Kingston
High
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 101 tracts In Luzerne County
Elevated
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#1,201 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kingston and the region

Centroid at 41.2622, -75.8893 · click any tract to drill in

Why North End scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
22.2% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$973 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kingston
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kingston
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kingston
6.3

How North End compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North End risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 2129004.5Kingstonparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 37Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.8%Peak (2001)
  • 6Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42079212900
Filings climbed 200% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North End. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North End

Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.1/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 37 filings here across 7 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 4.8% of renter households.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Wilkes-Barre. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 2.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $66,417, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Rent takes 30% or more of income for 37% of renters. It tracks the Luzerne County average of 4.5 closely.

Average gross rent is $973, close to the Kingston average. 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42079212900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42079212900?

Census tract 42079212900 in the North End neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42079212900?

Median gross rent is $973/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42079212900?

22.2% of residents in tract 42079212900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,561.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42079212900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 27th, minority 32th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 42079212900 considered part of North End?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42079212900 fall within North End (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42079212900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42079212900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.06% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42079212900 compare to Kingston overall?

Tract 42079212900 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Kingston at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kingston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42079212900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kingston

Top eight tracts in Kingston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related