Sockanosset Eviction Risk: Lower , Cranston
Tract 44007013900 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,110 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 44007013900 covers part of the Sockanosset area of Cranston, RI, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Providence County at 43.2%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Cranston and the region
Centroid at 41.7596, -71.4507 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sockanosset scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sockanosset compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 79%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 63%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 33Total filings over 2 yrs
- 3.18%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.4%Peak (2016)
- 18Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 126Total filings 2020-21
- 1.6Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.88×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.6%Food insecurity
- 9.4%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 6.3%No health insurance
- 15.7%Frequent mental distress
- 28.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sockanosset
Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.6/10. It sits 1.9 points below the Providence County average of 5.7.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 33 filings here across 2 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2016, when 3.4% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Providence. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 3.2% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10.
Statewide the RI average is 5.3, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $1,435, close to the Cranston average. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $75,104.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 44007013900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007013900?
What is the average rent in tract 44007013900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 44007013900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 44007013900?
Is tract 44007013900 considered part of Sockanosset?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007013900?
Did eviction filings in tract 44007013900 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 44007013900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 44007013900 compare to Cranston overall?
Was tract 44007013900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Cranston
Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.