Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Darlington Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pawtucket

Tract 44007017100 · Providence County, RI · pop 4,976 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 44007017100 covers part of the Darlington area of Pawtucket, RI, and scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. 31% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Providence County average of 43.2%.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 28% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,861
Renter share41.0%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$82,266

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 11 tracts In Darlington
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 21 tracts In Pawtucket
Moderate
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#69 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Moderate
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pawtucket and the region

Centroid at 41.8672, -71.3709 · click any tract to drill in

Why Darlington scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,175 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pawtucket
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pawtucket
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0

How Darlington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Darlington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 017100Pawtucket: 5.95.9Pawtucketparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 163Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 8.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.8%Peak (2015)
  • 75Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 383Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.91×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2020-08-01: 15 filings (1.94× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (2.35× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2022-11-01: 11 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 30 filings (4.29× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2023-11-01: 17 filings (3.09× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-05-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (1.24× baseline)2024-10-01: 17 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-03-01: 21 filings (5.60× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Darlington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Darlington

The clearest offset is supply constraint at 2.3/10. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 163 filings here across 2 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2015, when 8.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 8.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 77th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $82,266, annual rent is just 17%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Providence County average of 5.7 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007017100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007017100?

Census tract 44007017100 in the Darlington neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007017100?

Median gross rent is $1,175/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007017100?

13.3% of residents in tract 44007017100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,976.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007017100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 79th, minority 69th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 44007017100 considered part of Darlington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007017100 fall within Darlington (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007017100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 163 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007017100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.59% of renter households, peaking at 8.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007017100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.91× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007017100 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007017100 compare to Pawtucket overall?

Tract 44007017100 scores 5.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Pawtucket at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pawtucket eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007017100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pawtucket

Top eight tracts in Pawtucket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related