Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally

Woodlawn Eviction Risk: Elevated , Pawtucket

Tract 44007016700 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,600 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

44007016700 is a census tract in the Woodlawn area of Pawtucket, RI. It scores 7.1/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs 58% here against 43.2% across Providence County.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 30% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,576
Renter share70.4%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate16.8%
Median income$49,529

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In Woodlawn
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 21 tracts In Pawtucket
High
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#48 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Elevated
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#55 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pawtucket and the region

Centroid at 41.8717, -71.3780 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodlawn scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
16.8% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,181 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pawtucket
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pawtucket
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pawtucket
6.0

How Woodlawn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodlawn risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 016700Pawtucket: 5.95.9Pawtucketparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 80Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 4.57%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.1%Peak (2015)
  • 37Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 227Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-06-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Woodlawn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodlawn

Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. 70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 2.3/10.

It sits 1.4 points above the Providence County average of 5.7. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. The filing record is not thin: 80 evictions over 2 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2015 at 5.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.6% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #12,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the RI average is 5.3, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,181, close to the Pawtucket average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007016700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007016700?

Census tract 44007016700 in the Woodlawn neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007016700?

Median gross rent is $1,181/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007016700?

16.8% of residents in tract 44007016700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,600.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007016700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 89th, minority 77th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 44007016700 considered part of Woodlawn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007016700 fall within Woodlawn (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007016700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 80 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007016700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.57% of renter households, peaking at 5.1% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007016700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007016700 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007016700 compare to Pawtucket overall?

Tract 44007016700 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Pawtucket at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pawtucket eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007016700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 31% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pawtucket

Top eight tracts in Pawtucket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related