Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Ibis Glade Eviction Risk: Lower , Hanahan
Tract 45015020812 · Berkeley County, SC · pop 6,759 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
How risky is Ibis Glade in Hanahan for landlords? Census tract 45015020812 scores 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #15,265 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
55% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,111 a month against an average household income of $122,900 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,360
Renter share19.3%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$122,900
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hanahan and the region
Centroid at 32.9415, -80.0087 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ibis Glade scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hanahan
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,111 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hanahan
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9
How Ibis Glade compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 132Total filings over 5 yrs
- 9.01%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.5%Peak (2014)
- 32Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 88% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ibis Glade. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.4%Food insecurity
- 4.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 22.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ibis Glade
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Berkeley County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 132 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 9.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.5% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 45015020812
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45015020812?
Census tract 45015020812 in the Ibis Glade neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45015020812?
Median gross rent is $2,111/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45015020812?
4.9% of residents in tract 45015020812 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,759.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45015020812?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 6th, minority 30th, housing 8th.
Q5
Is tract 45015020812 considered part of Ibis Glade?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45015020812 fall within Ibis Glade (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45015020812?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 132 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45015020812 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.01% of renter households, peaking at 10.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45015020812 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45015020812 compare to Hanahan overall?
Tract 45015020812 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Hanahan at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hanahan
Top eight tracts in Hanahan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related