Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Ibis Glade Eviction Risk: Lower , Hanahan
Tract 45015020904 · Berkeley County, SC · pop 4,457 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 45015020904, home to 4,457 residents in the Ibis Glade area of Hanahan, scores 6.1/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,548 monthly, set against $84,291 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,546
Renter share41.5%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$84,291
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
64
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
24
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hanahan and the region
Centroid at 32.9472, -80.0321 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ibis Glade scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hanahan
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,548 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hanahan
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hanahan
6.9
How Ibis Glade compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 939Total filings over 5 yrs
- 29.60%Avg annual filing rate
- 31.8%Peak (2012)
- 182Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 26% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ibis Glade. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.1%Housing insecurity
- 8.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.1%Food insecurity
- 8.3%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 11.0%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 31.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ibis Glade
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Berkeley County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 939 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 29.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 31.8% of renter households in 2012.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 45015020904
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45015020904?
Census tract 45015020904 in the Ibis Glade neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45015020904?
Median gross rent is $1,548/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45015020904?
13.8% of residents in tract 45015020904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,457.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45015020904?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 88th, minority 49th, housing 48th.
Q5
Is tract 45015020904 considered part of Ibis Glade?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45015020904 fall within Ibis Glade (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45015020904?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 939 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45015020904 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 29.60% of renter households, peaking at 31.8% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45015020904 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45015020904 compare to Hanahan overall?
Tract 45015020904 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Hanahan at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hanahan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hanahan
Top eight tracts in Hanahan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related