Skip to content
Neighborhood · Socastee, SC

Queens Harbour Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 7,061 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10 · range 3–3

Queens Harbour maps to a single census tract in Socastee, SC, population 7,061. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3/10, in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs 65% against 27.2% citywide, putting Queens Harbour 37.4% over its own city.

29% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is economic stress, at 1/10. Well under the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty, at 2/10.

On the high side is tenant-organizing strength at 7.6/10. SNAP participation is 6.2% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

At $1,136 a month, rents sit 9% under what the rest of Socastee commands. Among the 6 mapped neighborhoods of Socastee, it ranks #6 by risk, the lower third. At 15% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.

Rent takes 18% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Queens Harbour vs Socastee How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
64.6% +138%
Socastee: 27.2%
Average gross rent
$1,136 -9%
Socastee: $1,246
Average HH income
$77,651 +30%
Socastee: $59,826
Poverty rate
3.8% -71%
Socastee: 13.1%
Renter share
15.2% -55%
Socastee: 34.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Queens Harbour and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3–3

Why Queens Harbour scores 3

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.1–2.1 across tracts
2.1
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.3–3.3 across tracts
3.3
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Rent control risk
65% of income on rent · Range 5.1–5.1 across tracts
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
15% renter households · Range 7.6–7.6 across tracts
7.6
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.7–5.7 across tracts
5.7
Economic stress
3.8% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Risk score comparison

Queens Harbour vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Queens Harbour score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.0Queens HarbourNeighborhood3.8Parent cityhost city3.8Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Queens Harbour

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract↕ Score↕ Pop↕ % over 30% on rent↕ Average rent↕
45051051607 3 7,061 65% $1,136
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 50

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 48%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 89%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 33%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 24%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Queens Harbour

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Queens Harbour

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Queens Harbour?

Queens Harbour scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Queens Harbour compare to Socastee overall?

Queens Harbour scores 0.8 points lower than Socastee overall (3.8/10). Renters spend 65% of income on rent vs 27% citywide. Average rent: $1,136 vs $1,246.
Q3

What is the average rent in Queens Harbour?

Average gross rent in Queens Harbour is $1,136/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Queens Harbour residents are renters?

15% of Queens Harbour households are renter-occupied (vs 34% in Socastee). The neighborhood has 7,061 residents.
Q5

Is Queens Harbour a high social-vulnerability area?

Queens Harbour sits in the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Queens Harbour for landlords?

Queens Harbour carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Socastee as a whole (3.8/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Queens Harbour?

Queens Harbour has 6,637 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (79.1%), Black (non-Hispanic) (7.9%), Other / Multiracial (7.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Queens Harbour

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Socastee

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Queens Harbour.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further