Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Queens Harbour Eviction Risk: Lower , Socastee

Tract 45051051607 · Horry County, SC · pop 7,061 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 45051051607 in Queens Harbour in Socastee ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 7,061 residents. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.

About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,136 a month against an average household income of $77,651 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 5% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,388
Renter share15.2%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$77,651

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Queens Harbour
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Socastee
Very Low
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 77 tracts In Horry County
Very Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,055 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Socastee and the region

Centroid at 33.6458, -79.0071 · click any tract to drill in

Why Queens Harbour scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Socastee
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,136 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Socastee
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Socastee
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Socastee
5.7

How Queens Harbour compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Queens Harbour risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 051607Socastee: 2.52.5Socasteeparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Queens Harbour

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Socastee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Horry County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 49th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45051051607

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45051051607?

Census tract 45051051607 in the Queens Harbour neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45051051607?

Median gross rent is $1,136/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45051051607?

3.8% of residents in tract 45051051607 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,061.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45051051607?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 89th, minority 33th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 45051051607 considered part of Queens Harbour?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45051051607 fall within Queens Harbour (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 45051051607 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45051051607 compare to Socastee overall?

Tract 45051051607 scores 2.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Socastee at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Socastee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Socastee

Top eight tracts in Socastee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related