Queens Harbour Eviction Risk: Lower , Socastee
Tract 45051051607 · Horry County, SC · pop 7,061 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 5.6/10, tract 45051051607 in Queens Harbour in Socastee ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 7,061 residents. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.
About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,136 a month against an average household income of $77,651 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Socastee and the region
Centroid at 33.6458, -79.0071 · click any tract to drill in
Why Queens Harbour scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Queens Harbour compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 89%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.0%Food insecurity
- 6.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 15.8%Frequent mental distress
- 29.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Queens Harbour
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Socastee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Horry County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 49th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 45051051607
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45051051607?
What is the average rent in tract 45051051607?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45051051607?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45051051607?
Is tract 45051051607 considered part of Queens Harbour?
What share of households in tract 45051051607 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45051051607 compare to Socastee overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Socastee
Top eight tracts in Socastee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.