Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Quail Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Irmo

Tract 45063021110 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,663 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 45063021110 runs through the Quail Valley neighborhood of Irmo. With 2,663 residents, it scores 4.3/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 9% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,414 a month while the average household earns $95,444 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 8% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,045
Renter share8.9%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$95,444

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Quail Valley
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In Irmo
Moderate
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#78 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#1,213 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irmo and the region

Centroid at 34.0727, -81.1829 · click any tract to drill in

Why Quail Valley scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irmo
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,414 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irmo
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irmo
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irmo
5.0

How Quail Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Quail Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 021110Irmo: 2.62.6Irmoparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 91Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 17.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.1%Peak (2014)
  • 24Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450630211102010: 18 filings (15.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 21 filings (20.19/100 renter HHs)2012: 16 filings (15.38/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (11.54/100 renter HHs)2014: 24 filings (23.08/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 33% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Quail Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Quail Valley

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 5.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irmo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lexington County average of 5.3 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 91 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 17.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.1% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021110

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021110?

Census tract 45063021110 in the Quail Valley neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021110?

Median gross rent is $1,414/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021110?

3.8% of residents in tract 45063021110 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,663.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021110?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 72th, minority 51th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021110 considered part of Quail Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021110 fall within Quail Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021110?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 91 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021110 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 17.04% of renter households, peaking at 23.1% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021110 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021110 compare to Irmo overall?

Tract 45063021110 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Irmo at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irmo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irmo

Top eight tracts in Irmo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related