Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Quail Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Irmo

Tract 45063021112 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,496 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 45063021112 covers the Quail Valley neighborhood of Irmo in South Carolina. Home to 2,496 residents, it scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,324 monthly, set against $71,393 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 10% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,217
Renter share23.6%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$71,393

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Quail Valley
Moderate
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Irmo
High
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,078 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irmo and the region

Centroid at 34.0793, -81.1703 · click any tract to drill in

Why Quail Valley scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irmo
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,324 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irmo
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irmo
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irmo
5.0

How Quail Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Quail Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 021112Irmo: 2.62.6Irmoparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 139Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 7.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.6%Peak (2012)
  • 33Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450630211122010: 18 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)2011: 30 filings (8.45/100 renter HHs)2012: 34 filings (9.58/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (6.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 33 filings (9.30/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 83% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Quail Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Quail Valley

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 5.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irmo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lexington County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 139 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 8.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.6% of renter households in 2012.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021112

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021112?

Census tract 45063021112 in the Quail Valley neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021112?

Median gross rent is $1,324/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021112?

5.6% of residents in tract 45063021112 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,496.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021112?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 89th, minority 46th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021112 considered part of Quail Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021112 fall within Quail Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021112?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 139 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021112 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.96% of renter households, peaking at 9.6% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021112 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021112 compare to Irmo overall?

Tract 45063021112 scores 2.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Irmo at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irmo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irmo

Top eight tracts in Irmo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related