Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Quail Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Irmo

Tract 45063021111 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,204 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 45063021111, home to 2,204 residents in Quail Valley in Irmo, scores 5.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.

About 30% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,572 a month while the average household earns $74,210 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 25% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units975
Renter share35.1%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate10.6%
Median income$74,210

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Quail Valley
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Irmo
Moderate
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Moderate
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#1,000 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irmo and the region

Centroid at 34.0662, -81.1555 · click any tract to drill in

Why Quail Valley scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irmo
4.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
10.6% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,572 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irmo
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irmo
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irmo
6.0

How Quail Valley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Quail Valley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 021111Irmo: 2.62.6Irmoparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,082Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 53.17%Avg annual filing rate
  • 62.2%Peak (2011)
  • 188Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450630211112010: 206 filings (61.68/100 renter HHs)2011: 267 filings (62.24/100 renter HHs)2012: 210 filings (48.95/100 renter HHs)2013: 211 filings (49.18/100 renter HHs)2014: 188 filings (43.82/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Quail Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Quail Valley

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irmo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lexington County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,082 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 53.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 62.2% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021111

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021111?

Census tract 45063021111 in the Quail Valley neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021111?

Median gross rent is $1,572/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021111?

10.6% of residents in tract 45063021111 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,204.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021111?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 13th, minority 52th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021111 considered part of Quail Valley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021111 fall within Quail Valley (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021111?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,082 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021111 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 53.17% of renter households, peaking at 62.2% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021111 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021111 compare to Irmo overall?

Tract 45063021111 scores 2.9/10, higher than the parent city of Irmo at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irmo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irmo

Top eight tracts in Irmo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related