2 census tracts · pop 5,111 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.9/10
· range 3.1–5.1
Woodland Pond takes in 2 census tracts of Red Bank, SC, population 5,111. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3.9/10, in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs 43% against 32.5% citywide, putting Woodland Pond 10.8% over its own city.
21% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 3.1 to 5.1, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.2/10.
Running hot is rent-regulation exposure at 7.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,242, 7% above the Red Bank average of $1,160.
Among the 4 mapped neighborhoods of Red Bank, it ranks #3 by risk, the lower third. At 20% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.
The closest comparables inside the same city are Persimmon Hill and Manchester Park. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $66,714.
For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 3.9 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
2 tracts · population-weighted
Woodland Pond vs Red BankHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority33%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport49%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Woodland Pond
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
13.6%Housing insecurity
9.4%Utility shutoff threat
17.6%Food insecurity
10.7%SNAP enrollment
11.3%No health insurance
31.7%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Woodland Pond
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Woodland Pond?
Woodland Pond scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Woodland Pond compare to Red Bank overall?
Woodland Pond scores 0.2 points higher than Red Bank overall (3.7/10). Renters spend 43% of income on rent vs 33% citywide. Average rent: $1,242 vs $1,160.
Q3
What is the average rent in Woodland Pond?
Average gross rent in Woodland Pond is $1,242/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Woodland Pond residents are renters?
20% of Woodland Pond households are renter-occupied (vs 23% in Red Bank). The neighborhood has 5,111 residents.
Q5
Is Woodland Pond a high social-vulnerability area?
Woodland Pond sits in the 46th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Woodland Pond have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Woodland Pond is census tract 45063021051 (score 5.1/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 3.1 to 5.1, a spread of 2 points.
Q7
How safe is Woodland Pond for landlords?
Woodland Pond carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.9/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Red Bank as a whole (3.7/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Woodland Pond?
Woodland Pond has 5,487 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (75.6%), Black (non-Hispanic) (13.9%), Hispanic / Latino (5.1%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
