Skip to content
Summit, South Dakota eviction risk overview
City brief · 359 residents

Summit, SD Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Roberts County · Population 359

In 2026
Risk score
1.6
VERY LOW

85th percentile, South Dakota.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average3.1 Now1.6
10 5 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 2.8 2001 · score 2.9 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 3.0 2005 · score 3.1 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.8 2009 · score 3.9 2010 · score 4.0 2011 · score 4.0 2012 · score 3.6 2013 · score 3.7 2014 · score 3.8 2015 · score 3.9 2016 · score 3.4 2017 · score 3.5 2018 · score 3.7 2019 · score 3.8 2020 · score 4.2 2021 · score 4.3 2022 · score 4.3 2023 · score 4.3 2024 · score 4.2 2025 · score 3.2 2026 · score 1.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.6 Regional 3.6 State 1.5 Economic 7.7 Supply 5.1 Rent Control 3.7 Eviction 1.9 Tenant 6.8 Housing 6.0 1.6 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +23.0% (2024)
    3.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.6
  3. State political climate
    South Dakota legislature & governorship
    1.5
  4. Economic stress
    22.1% poverty · 5.7% unemp.
    7.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $763 average · 35.3% renters
    5.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    21.7% of income on rent
    3.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    20 days filing → judgment
    1.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    35.3% renters
    6.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Summit and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Summit compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Roberts County
Moderate
#6 of 12 cities
Rank in county, 55th percentileBottomTop
#6 of 12 cities in Roberts County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in South Dakota
High
#99 of 484 cities
Rank in state, 80th percentileBottomTop
#99 of 484 cities in South Dakota for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Summit risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Summit: 1.61.6SummitThis cityCounty: 1.61.6Countyavg in countyState: 1.51.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.6
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 20d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $763/mo. A contested eviction takes 20 days and costs $829-$2,488 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 35.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 359 residents, 35.3% rent. 22% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 22.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.6 and 3.6 (GOP margin +23.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.5, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.9, housing court bias 6, rent-control risk 3.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.7. Supply constraint: 5.1. The numbers behind those: 22.1% poverty, 5.7% unemployment, 22% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Summit sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Summit, SD

Landlording in Summit, South Dakota, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.6/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Summit is a city of 359 residents where 35.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 21.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $763/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Summit eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Summit closes 20 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Summit's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Summit runs $829 to $2,488 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 20 days of typical timeline and $763/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.8/10 in Summit, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In South Dakota, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Summit: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match South Dakota's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,488 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Summit

Trap · $1/10
For landlords, the 3.2/10 score is most actionable when combined with Grant County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: $1/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Summit without going to court?

No. In South Dakota, you must go through the court process to legally evict a tenant and regain possession of your property. Self-help evictions, like changing locks or turning off utilities, are illegal and can lead to serious penalties against you.

Q2

How long does a tenant have to move out after a judge rules for eviction?

Typically, a judge will give the tenant a few days, often 3-5 days, to vacate the property voluntarily after an eviction order is issued. If they don't leave, the sheriff will then execute the writ of possession.

Q3

Is there rent control in Summit, SD?

No, there are no statewide or local rent control laws in Summit or anywhere else in South Dakota. Landlords generally have the freedom to set and adjust rents as market conditions dictate, provided proper notice is given for increases.

Q4

What if my tenant claims I didn't maintain the property?

Tenants in South Dakota have a right to a habitable living space. If a tenant raises maintenance issues, address them promptly and document your efforts. If they withhold rent over maintenance, it can complicate an eviction case. Always keep good records of repairs and communication.

Q5

Should I always hire an attorney for an eviction in Summit?

While not legally required, hiring an attorney for an eviction is highly recommended, especially if you're unfamiliar with court procedures. An attorney can ensure all legal notices are correct, deadlines are met, and your case is presented effectively, minimizing delays and potential costly errors. Given the low eviction difficulty score here, a good attorney can make it very efficient.

Q6

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No, you cannot keep a security deposit for normal wear and tear. This includes things like minor scuffs on walls, faded paint, or worn carpet. The deposit is for actual damages caused by the tenant beyond normal use, or for unpaid rent. Document the property's condition before and after tenancy with photos or videos.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.6/10 places Summit in the 85th percentile of South Dakota cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.