Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Graysville Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 01073012103 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 4,593 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Graysville

Census tract 01073012103 covers Graysville, home to 4,593 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 32% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,021 a month against an average household income of $58,289 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 19% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,864
Renter share27.6%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate17.0%
Median income$58,289

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Graysville
Very High
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#102 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#776 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Moderate
National
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#41,065 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Graysville and the region

Centroid at 33.6190, -86.9451 · click any tract to drill in

Why Graysville scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Graysville
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
17.0% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,021 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Graysville
2.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Graysville
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Graysville
4.3

How Graysville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Graysville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 012103Graysville: 2.32.3Graysvilleparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 63

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 95Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.32%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2014)
  • 10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010730121032000: 4 filings (1.80/100 renter HHs)2001: 7 filings (3.15/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (5.40/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (1.80/100 renter HHs)2005: 10 filings (5.89/100 renter HHs)2006: 6 filings (3.54/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (1.63/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)2014: 15 filings (4.07/100 renter HHs)2015: 13 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2016: 10 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Graysville

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Graysville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 95 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 3.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.1% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073012103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073012103?

Census tract 01073012103 in Graysville scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073012103?

Median gross rent is $1,021/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073012103?

17.0% of residents in tract 01073012103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,593.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073012103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 62th, minority 68th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073012103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 95 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073012103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.32% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073012103 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073012103 compare to Graysville overall?

Tract 01073012103 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Graysville at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Graysville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Graysville

Top eight tracts in Graysville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related