Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally
Leeds Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 01073011003 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 2,153
01073011003 is a census tract in Leeds, AL. It scores 4.5/10 for landlords. The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.8/10.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units861
Renter share46.9%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate24.6%
Median income$62,604
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
69
th percentile
Elevated
National
51
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Leeds and the region
Centroid at 33.5441, -86.5424 · click any tract to drill in
Why Leeds scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Leeds
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
24.6% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$887 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leeds
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leeds
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leeds
4.2
How Leeds compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.0%Housing insecurity
- 10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.4%Food insecurity
- 14.4%SNAP enrollment
- 10.0%Transit barriers
- 10.2%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 37.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Leeds
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10. The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2/10. Average gross rent is $887, 16% below the Leeds average. Cost burden runs 42% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County.
That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 5.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $62,604, annual rent is just 17%.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Jefferson County average of 4.3 closely. 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073011003
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073011003?
Census tract 01073011003 in Leeds scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073011003?
Median gross rent is $887/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073011003?
24.6% of residents in tract 01073011003 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,153.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073011003?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 97th, minority 33th, housing 22th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 01073011003 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 01073011003 compare to Leeds overall?
Tract 01073011003 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Leeds at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leeds; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Leeds
Top eight tracts in Leeds ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related