Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally

Tanuri Eviction Risk: Moderate , Catalina Foothills

Tract 04019003004 · Pima, AZ · pop 1,579 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 04019003004 covers part of the Tanuri area of Tucson, AZ, and scores 4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,579 residents. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 34% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units905
Renter share57.3%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$65,163

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tanuri
Very High
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#90 of 143 tracts In Catalina Foothills
Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#109 of 270 tracts In Pima
Elevated
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#627 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.2568, -110.8685 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanuri scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,061 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.5

How Tanuri compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanuri risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 003004Catalina Foothills: 3.43.4Catalina Foothillsparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,260Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 15.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 25.9%Peak (2004)
  • 43Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190030042004: 243 filings (25.85/100 renter HHs)2005: 159 filings (17.94/100 renter HHs)2006: 116 filings (13.09/100 renter HHs)2007: 121 filings (13.66/100 renter HHs)2008: 115 filings (12.98/100 renter HHs)2009: 133 filings (15.01/100 renter HHs)2010: 82 filings (24.40/100 renter HHs)2011: 71 filings (16.40/100 renter HHs)2012: 70 filings (16.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 65 filings (15.01/100 renter HHs)2016: 42 filings (10.32/100 renter HHs)2017: 43 filings (10.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 82% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanuri. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanuri

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,260 filings here across 12 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Filings peaked in 2004 at 25.9% of renter households. In a typical year about 16.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019003004

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019003004?

Census tract 04019003004 in the Tanuri neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019003004?

Median gross rent is $1,061/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019003004?

13.8% of residents in tract 04019003004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,579.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019003004?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 87th, minority 57th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 04019003004 considered part of Tanuri?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019003004 fall within Tanuri (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019003004?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,260 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019003004 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.95% of renter households, peaking at 25.9% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04019003004 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04019003004 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?

Tract 04019003004 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills

Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related