Tract 04019003004 ·
Pima, AZ · pop 1,579 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 04019003004 covers part of the Tanuri area of Tucson, AZ, and scores 4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,579 residents. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%Stable renters 34%Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units905
Renter share57.3%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$65,163
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Tanuri
Very High
Within parent city
37th percentile
#90 of 143 tracts In Catalina Foothills
Low
Within county
60th percentile
#109 of 270 tracts In Pima
Elevated
Within state
65th percentile
#627 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2568, -110.8685 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,061 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.5
How Tanuri compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
68%Socioeconomic
87%Household composition
57%Racial/ethnic minority
69%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.5%Housing insecurity
6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
10.4%Food insecurity
7.8%SNAP enrollment
6.9%Transit barriers
8.4%No health insurance
15.3%Frequent mental distress
30.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,260 filings here across 12 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2004 at 25.9% of renter households. In a typical year about 16.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019003004
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019003004?
Census tract 04019003004 in the Tanuri neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04019003004?
Median gross rent is $1,061/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019003004?
13.8% of residents in tract 04019003004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,579.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019003004?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 87th, minority 57th, housing 69th.
Q5
Is tract 04019003004 considered part of Tanuri?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04019003004 fall within Tanuri (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019003004?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,260 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019003004 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.95% of renter households, peaking at 25.9% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 04019003004 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 04019003004 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Tract 04019003004 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.