Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Stanfield Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 04021941402 ·
Pinal, AZ · pop 2,583 · 10% of tract blocks fall in Stanfield
Tract 04021941402 sits in Stanfield, AZ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. It is home to 2,583 residents. Cost burden runs 13% here against 37.6% across Pinal County.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 26%Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units686
Renter share29.9%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate12.9%
Median income$68,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Stanfield
Moderate
Within county
66th percentile
#33 of 95 tracts In Pinal
Elevated
Within state
66th percentile
#599 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
National
44th percentile
#47,371 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Stanfield and the region
Centroid at 32.7153, -111.9923 · click any tract to drill in
Why Stanfield scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stanfield
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
12.9% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$618 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stanfield
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stanfield
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stanfield
2.2
How Stanfield compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
22.3%Housing insecurity
14.5%Utility-shutoff threat
32.3%Food insecurity
21.5%SNAP enrollment
15.5%Transit barriers
22.6%No health insurance
19.5%Frequent mental distress
41.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Stanfield
The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Food insecurity runs 32.3% against 17.8% nationally.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 22.6% against 11.3% nationally.
13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $68,125, annual rent is just 11%. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Pinal County average of 3.8 closely.
Average gross rent is $618, close to the Stanfield average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 04021941402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04021941402?
Census tract 04021941402 in Stanfield scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04021941402?
Median gross rent is $618/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04021941402?
12.9% of residents in tract 04021941402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,583.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04021941402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 89th, minority 86th, housing 62th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 04021941402 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 04021941402 compare to Stanfield overall?
Tract 04021941402 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Stanfield at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stanfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.