Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

La Loma Park Eviction Risk: High , Berkeley

Tract 06001421600 · Alameda, CA · pop 3,854 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 8/10, tract 06001421600 in the La Loma Park area of Berkeley, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 13% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,557
Renter share21.8%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$228,547

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In La Loma Park
Moderate
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 34 tracts In Berkeley
Low
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#179 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#3,534 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Berkeley and the region

Centroid at 37.8839, -122.2560 · click any tract to drill in

Why La Loma Park scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Berkeley
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$2,284 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Berkeley
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Berkeley
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Berkeley
7.5

How La Loma Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
La Loma Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 421600Berkeley: 8.68.6Berkeleyparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in La Loma Park

On the high side, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.1/10. SNAP participation runs 4.5% against 15.2% nationally.

12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 22% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Against average income of $228,547, annual rent is just 12%. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 42% of renters.

It tracks the Alameda County average of 7.8 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001421600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001421600?

Census tract 06001421600 in the La Loma Park neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001421600?

Median gross rent is $2,284/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001421600?

8.7% of residents in tract 06001421600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,854.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001421600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 8th, minority 45th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 06001421600 considered part of La Loma Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001421600 fall within La Loma Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001421600 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001421600 compare to Berkeley overall?

Tract 06001421600 scores 8/10, lower than the parent city of Berkeley at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Berkeley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001421600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Berkeley

Top eight tracts in Berkeley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related