Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Vinsanto II Eviction Risk: Lower , Livermore

Tract 06001451703 · Alameda, CA · pop 3,827 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 06001451703 runs through the Vinsanto II area of Livermore. With 3,827 residents, it scores 5.4/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 41% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,088 a month against an average household income of $200,972 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 7% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,304
Renter share11.8%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$200,972

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Vinsanto II
Moderate
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 19 tracts In Livermore
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#366 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#8,819 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Livermore and the region

Centroid at 37.6673, -121.8010 · click any tract to drill in

Why Vinsanto II scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Livermore
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,088 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Livermore
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Livermore
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Livermore
5.0

How Vinsanto II compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Vinsanto II risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 451703Livermore: 7.87.8Livermoreparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Vinsanto II

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Livermore, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Alameda County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001451703

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001451703?

Census tract 06001451703 in the Vinsanto II neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001451703?

Median gross rent is $3,088/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001451703?

3.0% of residents in tract 06001451703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,827.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001451703?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 22th, minority 57th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 06001451703 considered part of Vinsanto II?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001451703 fall within Vinsanto II (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001451703 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001451703 compare to Livermore overall?

Tract 06001451703 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Livermore at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Livermore; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Livermore

Top eight tracts in Livermore ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related