Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Village II Eviction Risk: Moderate , Livermore
Tract 06001451504 · Alameda, CA · pop 1,539 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 5.6/10, tract 06001451504 in the Village II area of Livermore, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,539 residents. Cost burden runs roughly one in four here against 45.5% across Alameda County.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 17%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units536
Renter share22.0%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate1.3%
Median income$169,766
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
7
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
16
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Livermore and the region
Centroid at 37.6979, -121.7322 · click any tract to drill in
Why Village II scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Livermore
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,406 rent vs county FMR
7.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Livermore
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Livermore
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Livermore
5.0
How Village II compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 9%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 69%Racial/ethnic minority
- 37%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Village II. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.7%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 4.9%No health insurance
- 15.9%Frequent mental distress
- 24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Village II
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. It sits 2.2 points below the Alameda County average of 7.8. The voucher gap is 27.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Average gross rent is $3,406, 27% above the Livermore average.
Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.0% against 15.2% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06001451504
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001451504?
Census tract 06001451504 in the Village II neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06001451504?
Median gross rent is $3,406/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06001451504?
1.3% of residents in tract 06001451504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,539.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06001451504?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 14th, minority 69th, housing 37th.
Q5
Is tract 06001451504 considered part of Village II?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001451504 fall within Village II (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06001451504 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06001451504 compare to Livermore overall?
Tract 06001451504 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Livermore at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Livermore; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Livermore
Top eight tracts in Livermore ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Springtown
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Portola Glen
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Autumn Springs
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
The Grove
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06001451602
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06001451103
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
California Ranch
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Autumn Springs
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Related