Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Durham Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06007001500 · Butte, CA · pop 6,240 · 86% of tract blocks fall in Durham
Tract 06007001500 sits in Durham, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.2/10. It is home to 6,240 residents. 17% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Butte County average of 49.5%.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units2,068
Renter share30.4%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate5.9%
Median income$121,179
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
2
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
1
th percentile
Very Low
National
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Durham and the region
Centroid at 39.5938, -121.8461 · click any tract to drill in
Why Durham scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Durham
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.9% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,089 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Durham
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Durham
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Durham
3.0
How Durham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 32%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 76%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 8Total filings over 1 yrs
- 1.25%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.3%Peak (2014)
- 8Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.2%Food insecurity
- 11.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.8%Transit barriers
- 6.1%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 29.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Durham
It sits 3.4 points below the Butte County average of 6.6. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.
The filing record is not thin: 8 evictions over 1 years of observation. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.9/10.
Filings peaked in 2014 at 1.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.3% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #63,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 11% of average household income of $121,179, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 4.3 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06007001500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007001500?
Census tract 06007001500 in Durham scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06007001500?
Median gross rent is $1,089/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06007001500?
5.9% of residents in tract 06007001500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,240.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06007001500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 26th, minority 35th, housing 76th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06007001500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 06007001500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.25% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 06007001500 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06007001500 compare to Durham overall?
Tract 06007001500 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Durham at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Durham; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related