Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Forest Ranch Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06007001601 ·
Butte, CA · pop 1,910 · 21% of tract blocks fall in Forest Ranch
Tract 06007001601 sits in Forest Ranch, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 1,910. 65% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 1%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units908
Renter share8.5%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$153,109
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Forest Ranch
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#54 of 54 tracts In Butte
Very Low
Within state
0th percentile
#9,089 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Forest Ranch and the region
Centroid at 39.9160, -121.6670 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forest Ranch scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Ranch
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,615 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Ranch
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Ranch
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Ranch
4.0
How Forest Ranch compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.7%Housing insecurity
4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
10.0%Food insecurity
9.5%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
5.9%No health insurance
15.8%Frequent mental distress
30.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Forest Ranch
Cost burden runs 91% here against 49.5% across Butte County. It sits 3.6 points below the Butte County average of 6.6.
The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 78.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.8/10.
Food insecurity runs 10.0% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 3.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 4.5 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06007001601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007001601?
Census tract 06007001601 in Forest Ranch scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06007001601?
Median gross rent is $2,615/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 91% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06007001601?
4.2% of residents in tract 06007001601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,910.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06007001601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 80th, minority 26th, housing 13th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06007001601 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06007001601 compare to Forest Ranch overall?
Tract 06007001601 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Forest Ranch at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Ranch; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.