Census Tract · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally
Concow Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06007002401 ·
Butte, CA · pop 1,016 · 17% of tract blocks fall in Concow
06007002401 is a census tract in Concow, CA. It scores 3.5/10 for landlords. The severe-burden share is 57%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 4%Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units450
Renter share12.0%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$52,955
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Concow
Moderate
Within county
4th percentile
#52 of 54 tracts In Butte
Very Low
Within state
1th percentile
#9,028 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
31th percentile
#57,812 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Concow and the region
Centroid at 39.7590, -121.4356 · click any tract to drill in
Why Concow scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concow
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$2,065 rent vs county FMR
9.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concow
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concow
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concow
4.6
How Concow compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.7%Housing insecurity
6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
12.7%Food insecurity
12.8%SNAP enrollment
7.5%Transit barriers
6.1%No health insurance
17.1%Frequent mental distress
33.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Concow
Against the Butte County average of 6.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.1 points. The voucher gap is 40.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Against Butte County at 49.5%, 65% of renters here are cost-burdened. Set annual rent against average income of $52,955 and the ratio lands at 47%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.1/10. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 1/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.5/10. On the national scale it lands near the 31st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.2/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 4.0 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06007002401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007002401?
Census tract 06007002401 in Concow scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06007002401?
Median gross rent is $2,065/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06007002401?
6.1% of residents in tract 06007002401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,016.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06007002401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 20th, minority 45th, housing 66th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06007002401 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06007002401 compare to Concow overall?
Tract 06007002401 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Concow at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concow; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.