Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

The Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Concord

Tract 06013337202 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,515 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 06013337202 covers part of the The Palms area of Concord, CA, and scores 7.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,515. The severe-burden share is 41%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 12% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,971
Renter share27.5%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$105,858

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In The Palms
Moderate
Within parent city
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 28 tracts In Concord
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#71 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Elevated
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#4,025 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Concord and the region

Centroid at 37.9505, -122.0230 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Palms scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$2,418 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6

How The Palms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Palms risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.7This tracttract 3372027.4Concordparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Palms

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10. Cost burden runs 57% here against 48.7% across Contra Costa County.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.4/10. Against the Contra Costa County average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points.

That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.6/10.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $2,418, close to the Concord average. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $105,858.

28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013337202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013337202?

Census tract 06013337202 in the The Palms neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013337202?

Median gross rent is $2,418/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013337202?

9.6% of residents in tract 06013337202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,515.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013337202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 85th, minority 64th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06013337202 considered part of The Palms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013337202 fall within The Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013337202 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013337202 compare to Concord overall?

Tract 06013337202 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Concord at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Concord

Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related