Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally
Fruitbowl Eviction Risk: High , Concord
Tract 06013338101 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,543 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 06013338101 covers part of the Fruitbowl area of Concord, CA, and scores 8.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,543. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,764
Renter share48.4%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$76,123
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
77
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Concord and the region
Centroid at 37.9489, -122.0425 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitbowl scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$2,206 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6
How Fruitbowl compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitbowl. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.3%Food insecurity
- 18.7%SNAP enrollment
- 11.3%Transit barriers
- 13.5%No health insurance
- 18.1%Frequent mental distress
- 31.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruitbowl
Against Contra Costa County at 48.7%, 75% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Contra Costa County average of 6.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $76,123, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.3/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10.
Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 9.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Average gross rent is $2,206, close to the Concord average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013338101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013338101?
Census tract 06013338101 in the Fruitbowl neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013338101?
Median gross rent is $2,206/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013338101?
16.2% of residents in tract 06013338101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,543.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013338101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 92th, minority 75th, housing 98th.
Q5
Is tract 06013338101 considered part of Fruitbowl?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013338101 fall within Fruitbowl (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013338101 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013338101 compare to Concord overall?
Tract 06013338101 scores 8.8/10, higher than the parent city of Concord at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Concord
Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Four Corners
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Four Corners
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Wisteria
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Wisteria
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Four Corners
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Four Corners
8.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Penny Lane
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Camelback
7.8
/ 10 · High
Related