Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally
Fruitbowl Eviction Risk: Elevated , Concord
Tract 06013338101 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,543 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Here is how census tract 06013338101, in the Fruitbowl neighborhood of Concord eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 6.3/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 5,543. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
75% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,206 a month against an average household income of $76,123 a year, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 48% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,764
Renter share48.4%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$76,123
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
82
th percentile
High
Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Concord and the region
Centroid at 37.9489, -122.0425 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitbowl scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$2,206 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6
How Fruitbowl compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitbowl. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.3%Food insecurity
- 18.7%SNAP enrollment
- 11.3%Transit barriers
- 13.5%No health insurance
- 18.1%Frequent mental distress
- 31.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruitbowl
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 17.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013338101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013338101?
Census tract 06013338101 in the Fruitbowl neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013338101?
Median gross rent is $2,206/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013338101?
16.2% of residents in tract 06013338101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,543.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013338101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 92th, minority 75th, housing 98th.
Q5
Is tract 06013338101 considered part of Fruitbowl?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013338101 fall within Fruitbowl (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013338101 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013338101 compare to Concord overall?
Tract 06013338101 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Concord
Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Four Corners
6.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Wisteria
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Wisteria
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Four Corners
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Four Corners
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Four Corners
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Penny Lane
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · CA
Camelback
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related