Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Fruitbowl Eviction Risk: Elevated , Concord

Tract 06013338102 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 3,231 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 06013338102 covers part of the Fruitbowl area of Concord, CA, and scores 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,231. 31% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Contra Costa County average of 48.7%.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 11% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,290
Renter share16.6%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$175,543

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Fruitbowl
Very Low
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 28 tracts In Concord
Very Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Moderate
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Concord and the region

Centroid at 37.9413, -122.0418 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruitbowl scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,487 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6

How Fruitbowl compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruitbowl risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.4This tracttract 3381027.4Concordparent city6.8Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruitbowl. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruitbowl

Average gross rent is $3,487, 53% above the Concord average. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 30.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8/10. Food insecurity runs 8.3% against 17.8% nationally.

Severe burden reaches 10%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013338102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013338102?

Census tract 06013338102 in the Fruitbowl neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013338102?

Median gross rent is $3,487/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013338102?

3.3% of residents in tract 06013338102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,231.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013338102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 44th, minority 57th, housing 20th.
Q5

Is tract 06013338102 considered part of Fruitbowl?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013338102 fall within Fruitbowl (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013338102 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013338102 compare to Concord overall?

Tract 06013338102 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Concord

Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related