Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Alamo Oaks Eviction Risk: Lower , Danville

Tract 06013346206 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 3,216 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

The Alamo Oaks area of Danville anchors census tract 06013346206, which lands at 5.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 59th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 52% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $250,001 a year. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 6% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,183
Renter share11.7%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Alamo Oaks
Moderate
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Danville
Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#229 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#9,027 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Danville and the region

Centroid at 37.8416, -122.0018 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alamo Oaks scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Danville
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Danville
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Danville
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Danville
4.2

How Alamo Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alamo Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 346206Danville: 8.18.1Danvilleparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alamo Oaks

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Danville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013346206

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013346206?

Census tract 06013346206 in the Alamo Oaks neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013346206?

4.1% of residents in tract 06013346206 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,216.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013346206?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 18th, minority 51th, housing 44th.
Q4

Is tract 06013346206 considered part of Alamo Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013346206 fall within Alamo Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06013346206 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06013346206 compare to Danville overall?

Tract 06013346206 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Danville at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Danville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Danville

Top eight tracts in Danville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related