Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Clayton Valley Highlands Eviction Risk: Lower , Concord

Tract 06013355309 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,150 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

In Clayton Valley Highlands in Concord, census tract 06013355309 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 16% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,805 a month against an average household income of $199,545 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 5% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,576
Renter share5.8%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$199,545

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Clayton Valley Highlands
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 28 tracts In Concord
Very Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#120 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Moderate
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#7,168 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Concord and the region

Centroid at 37.9360, -121.9720 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clayton Valley Highlands scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,805 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6

How Clayton Valley Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clayton Valley Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 355309Concord: 8.08.0Concordparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Clayton Valley Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clayton Valley Highlands

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013355309

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013355309?

Census tract 06013355309 in the Clayton Valley Highlands neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013355309?

Median gross rent is $2,805/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013355309?

3.0% of residents in tract 06013355309 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,150.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013355309?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 30th, minority 54th, housing 0th.
Q5

Is tract 06013355309 considered part of Clayton Valley Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013355309 fall within Clayton Valley Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013355309 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013355309 compare to Concord overall?

Tract 06013355309 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Concord

Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related