Clayton Valley Highlands Eviction Risk: Lower , Concord
Tract 06013355309 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,150 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
In Clayton Valley Highlands in Concord, census tract 06013355309 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 16% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,805 a month against an average household income of $199,545 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Concord and the region
Centroid at 37.9360, -121.9720 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clayton Valley Highlands scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Clayton Valley Highlands compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 0%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Clayton Valley Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 6.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.0%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 13.7%Frequent mental distress
- 23.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Clayton Valley Highlands
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06013355309
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013355309?
What is the average rent in tract 06013355309?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013355309?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013355309?
Is tract 06013355309 considered part of Clayton Valley Highlands?
What share of households in tract 06013355309 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06013355309 compare to Concord overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Concord
Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.