Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Thousand Oaks Eviction Risk: Lower , Kensington
Tract 06013391000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 2,568 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06013391000 (the Thousand Oaks neighborhood of Kensington, California) comes in at 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.
About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $179,643 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,098
Renter share15.3%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$179,643
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
1
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Kensington and the region
Centroid at 37.9071, -122.2843 · click any tract to drill in
Why Thousand Oaks scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Kensington
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kensington
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kensington
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kensington
4.0
How Thousand Oaks compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 62%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 15%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 2%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Thousand Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 2.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.7%Food insecurity
- 3.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 2.8%No health insurance
- 11.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Thousand Oaks
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 8.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kensington, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
In CDC survey modeling, about 4.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013391000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013391000?
Census tract 06013391000 in the Thousand Oaks neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013391000?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013391000?
3.1% of residents in tract 06013391000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,568.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013391000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 62th, minority 52th, housing 15th.
Q5
Is tract 06013391000 considered part of Thousand Oaks?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013391000 fall within Thousand Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013391000 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013391000 compare to Kensington overall?
Tract 06013391000 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Kensington at 8.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kensington; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06013391000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Kensington
Top eight tracts in Kensington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related