Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally
Thousand Oaks Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kensington
Tract 06013392000 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 2,588 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 06013392000 covers part of the Thousand Oaks area of Kensington, CA, and scores 5.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,588. 4% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Contra Costa County average of 48.7%.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units988
Renter share13.8%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$228,438
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Kensington and the region
Centroid at 37.9094, -122.2749 · click any tract to drill in
Why Thousand Oaks scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Kensington
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kensington
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kensington
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kensington
4.0
How Thousand Oaks compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 2%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Thousand Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.6%Housing insecurity
- 2.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.6%Food insecurity
- 3.7%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 2.7%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 21.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Thousand Oaks
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.4/10. The voucher gap is 30.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.1/10. Against the Contra Costa County average of 6.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points.
SNAP participation runs 3.7% against 15.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10.
Housing insecurity runs 4.6% against 14.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #23,808 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.3/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013392000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013392000?
Census tract 06013392000 in the Thousand Oaks neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013392000?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 4% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013392000?
5.7% of residents in tract 06013392000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,588.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013392000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 24th, minority 43th, housing 1th.
Q5
Is tract 06013392000 considered part of Thousand Oaks?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013392000 fall within Thousand Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013392000 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013392000 compare to Kensington overall?
Tract 06013392000 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Kensington at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kensington; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06013392000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Kensington
Top eight tracts in Kensington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related