Sherman Oaks Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037128703 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,252 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06037128703 covers part of the Sherman Oaks area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,252. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1621, -118.4436 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sherman Oaks scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sherman Oaks compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 78%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 69%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 6%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sherman Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 11.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.9%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 26.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sherman Oaks
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
85% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. At $2,368 a month, rents run 23% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. about half of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $101,705.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037128703
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037128703?
What is the average rent in tract 06037128703?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037128703?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037128703?
Is tract 06037128703 considered part of Sherman Oaks?
What share of households in tract 06037128703 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037128703 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037128703 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.