Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally

Glassell Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037186302 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,850 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06037186302 covers part of the Glassell Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,850 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 16% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,902
Renter share32.9%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$89,880

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 11 tracts In Glassell Park
Low
Within parent city
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#800 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#1,052 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#1,681 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1127, -118.2289 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glassell Park scores 9.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,970 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Glassell Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glassell Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.19.1This tracttract 186302Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glassell Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glassell Park

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

It sits 0.7 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #3,797 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.8/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter.

Rent takes 30% or more of income for roughly one in two of renters. Average gross rent is $1,970, close to the Los Angeles average.

Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $89,880. 33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037186302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037186302?

Census tract 06037186302 in the Glassell Park neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037186302?

Median gross rent is $1,970/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037186302?

6.5% of residents in tract 06037186302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,850.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037186302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 26th, minority 74th, housing 46th.
Q5

Is tract 06037186302 considered part of Glassell Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037186302 fall within Glassell Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037186302 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037186302 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037186302 scores 9.1/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037186302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related