Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Glassell Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037183401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,416 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

06037183401 is a census tract in the Glassell Park area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.3/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,416. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 19% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units827
Renter share49.7%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate12.3%
Median income$105,701

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 11 tracts In Glassell Park
Elevated
Within parent city
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#738 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#930 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1217, -118.2092 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glassell Park scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.3% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,903 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Glassell Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glassell Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 183401Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glassell Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glassell Park

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened.

It sits 0.9 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 8.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $1,903, close to the Los Angeles average. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $105,701.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037183401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037183401?

Census tract 06037183401 in the Glassell Park neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037183401?

Median gross rent is $1,903/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037183401?

12.3% of residents in tract 06037183401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,416.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037183401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 59th, minority 84th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 06037183401 considered part of Glassell Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037183401 fall within Glassell Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037183401 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037183401 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037183401 scores 9.3/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037183401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related