Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally

Glassell Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037183402 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,939 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 06037183402 covers part of the Glassell Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,939. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 37% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,100
Renter share71.8%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$105,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 11 tracts In Glassell Park
Moderate
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#775 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#998 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#1,536 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1257, -118.2164 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glassell Park scores 9.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,894 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Glassell Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glassell Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.29.2This tracttract 183402Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glassell Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glassell Park

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 49% of renters here are cost-burdened.

It sits 0.8 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 7.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037183402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037183402?

Census tract 06037183402 in the Glassell Park neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037183402?

Median gross rent is $1,894/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037183402?

11.5% of residents in tract 06037183402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,939.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037183402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 18th, minority 82th, housing 86th.
Q5

Is tract 06037183402 considered part of Glassell Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037183402 fall within Glassell Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037183402 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037183402 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037183402 scores 9.2/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037183402 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related