Jewelry District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037207711 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,189 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Census tract 06037207711 covers part of the Jewelry District area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,189 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0464, -118.2648 · click any tract to drill in
Why Jewelry District scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Jewelry District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 70%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Jewelry District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.9%Food insecurity
- 7.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 17.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Jewelry District
At $3,249 a month, rents run 68% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
41% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
The voucher gap is 23.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Disability prevalence runs 17.9% against 31.5% nationally.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 4.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037207711
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037207711?
What is the average rent in tract 06037207711?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037207711?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037207711?
Is tract 06037207711 considered part of Jewelry District?
What share of households in tract 06037207711 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037207711 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037207711 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.