Jewelry District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037207901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,227 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 06037207901 sits in the Jewelry District area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0429, -118.2642 · click any tract to drill in
Why Jewelry District scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Jewelry District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 63%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 93%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Jewelry District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.0%Housing insecurity
- 7.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.9%Food insecurity
- 15.9%SNAP enrollment
- 9.5%Transit barriers
- 6.7%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 25.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Jewelry District
Average gross rent is $3,004, 55% above the Los Angeles average. Set annual rent against average income of $71,726 and the ratio lands at 50%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 90% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 31%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The voucher gap is 14.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037207901
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037207901?
What is the average rent in tract 06037207901?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037207901?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037207901?
Is tract 06037207901 considered part of Jewelry District?
What share of households in tract 06037207901 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037207901 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037207901 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.