Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037211910 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,143 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 06037211910 covers part of the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,143 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0672, -118.2985 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Bangladesh compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 95%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.4%Housing insecurity
- 10.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.2%Food insecurity
- 27.3%SNAP enrollment
- 14.3%Transit barriers
- 14.8%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 33.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh
99% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 39% of average household income of $51,895, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Food insecurity runs 30.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 27.3% against 15.2% nationally.
At $1,702 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 8.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037211910
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037211910?
What is the average rent in tract 06037211910?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037211910?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037211910?
Is tract 06037211910 considered part of Little Bangladesh?
What share of households in tract 06037211910 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037211910 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037211910 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.