Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037211921 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,113 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 06037211921 sits in the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 61% Stable renters 38% Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units922
Renter share99.3%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate24.2%
Median income$42,071

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 25 tracts In Little Bangladesh
Very High
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#136 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#349 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0672, -118.2929 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
24.2% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,527 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Little Bangladesh compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Bangladesh risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 211921Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. 99% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $42,071 and the ratio lands at 44%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Average gross rent is $1,527, 21% below the Los Angeles average. Food insecurity runs 25.9% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 22.4% against 15.2% nationally.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037211921

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037211921?

Census tract 06037211921 in the Little Bangladesh neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037211921?

Median gross rent is $1,527/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037211921?

24.2% of residents in tract 06037211921 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,113.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037211921?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 20th, minority 95th, housing 77th.
Q5

Is tract 06037211921 considered part of Little Bangladesh?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037211921 fall within Little Bangladesh (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037211921 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037211921 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037211921 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037211921 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related