Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. 99% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Annualized rent equals 38% of average household income of $47,500, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. SNAP participation runs 33.0% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Average gross rent is $1,491, 23% below the Los Angeles average.

Housing insecurity runs 26.2% against 14.2% nationally. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.