Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037212410 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,084 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06037212410 covers part of the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0596, -118.3022 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Bangladesh compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 84
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 97%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 77%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 91%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.7%Housing insecurity
- 11.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.2%Food insecurity
- 32.4%SNAP enrollment
- 15.6%Transit barriers
- 15.4%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 35.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh
96% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 42% of average household income of $51,265, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. SNAP participation runs 32.4% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 34.2% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037212410
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037212410?
What is the average rent in tract 06037212410?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037212410?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037212410?
Is tract 06037212410 considered part of Little Bangladesh?
What share of households in tract 06037212410 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037212410 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037212410 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.