Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Westchester Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037276400 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,388 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06037276400 covers part of the Westchester Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,388. Cost burden runs 32% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score

8.4

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 16% Owners 77%

Tract context

Occupied units1,473

Renter share23.6%

SVI overall0.13

Poverty rate6.8%

Median income$233,009

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9669, -118.4095 · click any tract to drill in

Why Westchester Triangle scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

6.8% poverty · this tract

1.7

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

8.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Westchester Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

9%Socioeconomic
24%Household composition
52%Racial/ethnic minority
21%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Westchester Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

6.9%Housing insecurity
3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
7.0%Food insecurity
5.8%SNAP enrollment
4.6%Transit barriers
3.5%No health insurance
13.4%Frequent mental distress
23.1%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Westchester Triangle

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 81% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.2/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037276400

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037276400?

Census tract 06037276400 in the Westchester Triangle neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037276400?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037276400?

6.8% of residents in tract 06037276400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,388.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037276400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 24th, minority 52th, housing 21th.

Is tract 06037276400 considered part of Westchester Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037276400 fall within Westchester Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037276400 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037276400 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037276400 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037276400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.