Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Carson

Tract 06037543306 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 7,231 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

06037543306 is a census tract in the Lincoln Village area of Carson, CA. It scores 5.3/10 for landlords. It is home to 7,231 residents. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 13% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,804
Renter share19.8%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$100,993

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Lincoln Village
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 23 tracts In Carson
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#2,436 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#8,206 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Carson and the region

Centroid at 33.8355, -118.2329 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Village scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carson
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,550 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carson
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carson
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carson
6.0

How Lincoln Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.35.3This tracttract 543306Carson: 6.76.7Carsonparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Village

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.1 points. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Average gross rent is $2,550, 30% above the Carson average. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.2/10. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #28,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037543306

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037543306?

Census tract 06037543306 in the Lincoln Village neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037543306?

Median gross rent is $2,550/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037543306?

2.3% of residents in tract 06037543306 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,231.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037543306?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 38th, minority 91th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 06037543306 considered part of Lincoln Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037543306 fall within Lincoln Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037543306 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037543306 compare to Carson overall?

Tract 06037543306 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Carson at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carson; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037543306 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Carson

Top eight tracts in Carson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related